How the COVID-19 pandemic changed postoperative infections in urology wards: A retrospective cohort study from two urology departments.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the rate of postoperative infection and drug-resistant organism (DRO) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in urology departments. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Data from all elective surgical procedures carried out in two urology departments between April and June 2018 and the homologous period in 2020 were collected. Main outcomes were the number of postoperative infections during the pandemic and the number of DROs. Sample size was calculated based on a 50% relative reduction of infections during the pandemic. Variables were compared by Chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate predictors. RESULTS: A total of 698 patients undergoing elective surgery were included. The postoperative infection rate during the pre-pandemic period was of 14.1% compared to 12.1% during the pandemic (p=0.494). DROs were lower during the pandemic (92.3% vs. 52.4%, p=0.002). The pandemic period was the main predictor for reduced multidrug-resistant isolates, with an odds ratio of 0.10 (p=0.010, 95% confidence interval 0.016-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infection rates were not significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the adoption of enhanced infection preventive measures. There was, however, a decrease in the rate of DROs during this period, suggesting a secondary benefit to enhanced infection prevention practices adopted during the COVID-19 era.

How the COVID-19 pandemic changed urology residency - a nationwide survey from the Portuguese resident's perspective.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 30 question online survey was sent to all urology residents in Portugal between the 25th of April and the 25th of May 2020. Reduction in different areas of clinical activity during the COVID-19 period were evaluated and their perceived impact on their residency program was quantified. RESULTS: Forty-three (54.4%) Portuguese urology residents responded to our inquiry. Eighty-one percent report having supressed their activity by more than 75% in the outpatient clinic; 48.8% in diagnostic procedures; 29.3% in endoscopic surgery; 67.5% in laparoscopic/robotic surgery and 17.5% in major open surgery. There were no differences in clinical activity reduction across residency years. Considering the impact of COVID-19 on urology training programs, 32.6% plan on prolonging residency. During the COVID-19 period, a larger number of residents report having spent more time developing research projects or on continuing medical education, as compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 had a major impact on Urology residency in Portugal, with major short- and long-term consequences. A large proportion of residents are considering prolonging their residency as a result.

How the CO VID-19 pandemic changed urology residency - a nationwide survey from the Portuguese resident's perspective: Central European Journal of Urology

No significant statistical difference was seen between residency year and clinical activity reduction in its various categories (outpatient clinic, diagnostic procedures, laparoscopic/robotic surgery, endoscopic surgery, major classic surgery). Most residents (53.5%) reported that alternative surgical approaches were used, 34.9% reported having postponed laparoscopic/robotic surgery, 25.6% referred no change in surgical approach and 4.7% reported using non-surgical alternatives no minimally invasive surgery (Figure 2). All Portuguese urology residents are trained in public hospitals, which received directives to limit the number of non-urgent hospital visits. [...]outpatient consultations and diagnostic procedures were greatly reduced, as portrayed by our results, where 65.6% and

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the utilisation of emergency urological services.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the number of patients attending the Urology Emergency Department (ED) of the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), as well as their demographic characteristics, the reasons for admission, the clinical severity under the Manchester triage system (MTS), and the need for emergency surgery or hospitalisation, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the equivalent period in 2019. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from patients attending the Urology ED of the CHUP over 3 weeks, from 11 March to 1 April 2020, and from the same period in the previous year (from 11 March to 1 April 2019). RESULTS: During the pandemic, 46.4% fewer patients visited our urological ED (122 vs 263). There was no significant difference in the mean age or the number of old patients (aged ≥65 years) between the two periods. However, significantly fewer female patients sought emergency urological services during the COVID-19 pandemic period (32.7% vs 14.8%, P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted between different clinical severity groups under the MTS. In 2019, significantly less patients required hospitalisation. The most common reasons for admission, during both periods, were haematuria, renal colic and urinary tract infections. The authors recognise that the study has several limitations, namely, those inherent to its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 significantly influenced people's urological care-seeking behaviour. Understanding the present situation is helpful for predicting future urological needs. Based on the results of this study, we have reason to speculate that people's requirements for urological services might grow explosively in the post-COVID-19 period. There should be further studies about the real state of long-term urological services and the consequences that this pandemic may have in terms of morbimortality not directly related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.